4.7 Article

Dynamic behavior of keyhole and molten pool under different oscillation paths for galvanized steel laser welding

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122947

关键词

Laser oscillating welding; Galvanized steel; Spatter suppression; Circular oscillation; Zig-zag oscillation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the dynamic behavior of a keyhole and molten pool under circular and zig-zag oscillating paths for laser welding on galvanized steel. The results showed that the circular path resulted in more spatters due to the large variation in keyhole length and a bulge in the molten pool, while the zig-zag path showed relatively stable keyhole and molten pool with little spatter.
This study investigated the dynamic behavior of a keyhole and molten pool under circular and zig-zag oscillating paths for laser welding on galvanized steel. A large variation in the length of the keyhole and a bulge in the molten pool resulted in more spatters in the case of a circular oscillating path, whereas a little spatter was observed in the case of a zig-zag oscillating path because of the relatively stable keyhole and molten pool observed by a high-speed camera. Numerical simulation results showed that zinc vapor entered the keyhole with a velocity of 93 m/s because of a large amount of zinc evaporation in the first half of the circular oscillating path, leading to a rapid increase in the keyhole size. In this case, the fluid near the rear wall of the keyhole accelerated to 1.7 m/s and gushed out of the molten pool in a spatter. In the zig-zag oscillating path, the zinc vapor continually entered the keyhole at a lower velocity, leading to a relatively stable keyhole. In this case, the maximum liquid velocity of the molten pool was 0.9 m/s, not reached the critical spattering velocity (1.36 m/s), thus no spatter occurred. These numerical results sufficiently explain the dynamic behavior of a keyhole and molten pool induced by zinc vapor, and an effective spatter suppression method is proposed. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据