4.5 Article

Characterisation of fish tofu fortified with skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) eyeball scleral cartilage biocalcium

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.16022

关键词

biocalcium; byproduct; eyeball scleral cartilage; fish tofu; Skipjack; surimi; ultrasonication

资金

  1. Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University under the Agro-Industrial Practice Project Scholarship
  2. Prince of Songkla University [AGR6502111N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of Skipjack tuna eyeball scleral cartilage biocalcium (SCBC) to fish tofu can enhance its nutritive value without adversely affecting its sensory properties.
Skipjack tuna eyeball scleral cartilage biocalcium (SCBC) with reduced particle can be fortified as the source of calcium in fish tofu. Ultrasonication at various times (0-30 min) was applied for the treatment of SCBC. No differences in mean particle size were observed, but the polydispersity index of SCBC decreased with augmenting ultrasonication times. SCBC without ultrasonication treatment at different amounts (0-10.0%) (w/w) was fortified into fish tofu. Breaking force, a* (redness) and b* (yellowness) increased, whereas deformation, L* (lightness) and whiteness index decreased as SCBC levels increased. Likeness scores of appearance, colour, texture, flavour, taste and overall likeness decreased with augmenting levels of SCBC (P < 0.05). No differences in likeness scores for odour and sandy mouth feel were attained, regardless of SCBC amounts added (P > 0.05). Fish tofu fortified with 7.5% (w/w) SCBC had a similar overall likeness score to the control. It showed a denser microstructure with greater ash and calcium contents than the control. Nevertheless, cross-linking of myosin heavy chain and actin became less when fish tofu was added with SCBC as witnessed by more retained protein bands. Therefore, the addition of SCBC up to 7.5 (w/w) increased the nutritive value of fish tofu without adverse effect on the sensory property.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据