4.3 Article

Potential of Fish Scale Biochar Nanocomposite with ZnO for Effective Sequestration of Cr (VI) from Water: Modeling and Kinetics

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s41742-022-00432-7

关键词

Nanocomposite; Fish scale biochar; Adsorption mechanism; Kinetics; Equilibrium

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan under NRPU [10377]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, novel fish scale biochar (FSB) and its nanocomposite with zinc oxide nanoparticles (FSB/ZnO) were used to treat chromium (Cr (VI))-contaminated wastewater. Results showed that maximum Cr removal was achieved with FSB/ZnO, and the adsorption capacity of FSB/ZnO was much higher than that of previously explored materials.
Surface and subsurface water resources are polluted with various anthropogenic activities and exert deleterious impact on the ecosystem. In this study, novel fish scale biochar (FSB) and its nanocomposite with zinc oxide nanoparticles (FSB/ZnO) were used to treat chromium (Cr (VI))-contaminated wastewater. Batch scale experiments were designed by varying initial Cr (VI) concentration (25-200 mg L-1), interaction time (15-180 min), solution pH (2- 8), and dosage of FSB and FSB/ZnO (1-4 gL(-1)). The surface characteristics of adsorbents were characterized with Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) analysis and point of zero charge (PZC). Results discovered that maximum Cr removal was achieved with FSB/ZnO (98.70%) followed by FSB (59.40%) at optimum conditions, i.e., pH-4, 50 mg Cr L-1, and 2 g L-1 adsorbent dosage at equilibrium. The FSB and FSB/ZnO showed maximum adsorption capacity of 48.08 and 90.09 mg g(-1), respectively, which is much higher than many previously explored materials. The isothermal experimental results revealed best fit with Freundlich model (R-2 = 0.982), while kinetic effects were better simulated with Pseudo 2(nd) order (PSO) (R-2 = 0.999) than other models. It is anticipated that the composite (FSB/ZnO) has greater capacity to treat Cr-containing water in contrast to FSB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据