4.2 Article

An Immersed Boundary Method Based on Parallel Adaptive Cartesian Grids for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flow

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10618562.2022.2108807

关键词

Cartesian grid generation; immersed boundary method; wall model; high Reynolds number; adaptive mesh refinement

资金

  1. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) [MCMS-I-0120G01]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX21-0181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a parallelised adaptive hierarchical Cartesian-based immersed boundary methodology is developed for high Reynolds number compressible flow. The methodology includes automatic grid generation, immersed boundary method, parallel strategy, and adaptive mesh refinement. Testing on transonic and supersonic flows in different dimensions shows good performance and robustness of the method.
In this paper, a set of parallelised adaptive hierarchical Cartesian-based immersed boundary methodology is developed for high Reynolds number compressible flow. First, a robust and efficient grid generation method based on the separation axis theorem for arbitrary geometry is presented for automatic Cartesian grid generation. Second, an immersed boundary method (IBM) is presented coupling with wall model for high Reynolds number flow. Third, a parallel strategy is implemented and special treatment is proposed to guarantee large-scale computing. Finally, cell-based adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) technology is used to capture fluid phenomena under different regimes including but not limited to shock waves and vortices. The overall performance of the methodology is tested through a wide range of regimes including transonic and supersonic flow with high Reynolds number in both two and three dimensions. Results are in good agreement with reference data and indicate the capability and robustness of the present methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据