4.7 Article

Energy, hydraulic and exergy analysis of a compound parabolic concentrator using hybrid nanofluid: An experimental study

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106181

关键词

Compound parabolic concentrator (CPC); Thermal efficiency; Exergy analysis; Solar collector; Hybrid nanofluid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to investigate the thermal performance and exergy analysis of a new hyNF in a compound parabolic collector. The experiment on a compound parabolic collector using a hyNF as well as its exergy analysis has been performed for the first time and is considered as one of the novelties of the present study. The results showed that the use of hyNFs improved the thermal properties and the Nusselt number, leading to an increase in thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency.
The aim of this study is to investigate the thermal performance and exergy analysis of a new hyNF in a compound parabolic collector. The experiment on a compound parabolic collector using a hyNF as well as its exergy analysis has been performed for the first time and is considered as one of the novelties of the present study. In this regard, a CPC has been designed and constructed, and then experimental thermal performance tests on days with standard conditions were carried out. The ethylene glycol (EG)-Water hybrid base fluid (10-90% Vol.) with SiO2 (90%) and MWCNT (10%) hybrid nanoparticles have been utilized. The results showed that the use of hyNFs due to improving the thermal properties and the Nusselt number leads to an increase in thermal efficiency than the base fluid. In particular, the maximum increase in thermal efficiency by using the hyNFs was 14.27% compared to the base fluid. In addition, the exergy efficiency increased by the utilization of hyNFs. The maximum increment in pumping power using hyNFs was 9.72%, which indicates that the demand for pumping power is very low compared to the net production of the useful heat rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据