4.3 Article

A Deep Transfer Learning Based Architecture for Brain Tumor Classification Using MR Images

期刊

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 332-344

出版社

KAUNAS UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.5755/j01.itc.51.2.30835

关键词

Artificial neural networks; Image classification; Learning systems; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new brain tumor diagnostic model using deep learning algorithm, aiming to improve the accuracy and reliability of radiology in detecting and classifying brain tumors in MR images, achieving an overall accuracy of 99.62% and enhancing efficiency in the healthcare sector.
Deep Learning (DL) is becoming more popular in the healthcare sectors due to the exponential growth of data availability and its excellent performance in diagnosing various diseases. This paper has aimed to design a new possible brain tumor diagnostic model to improve accuracy and reliability of radiology. In this paper, an advanced deep learning algorithm is used to detect and classify brain tumors in magnetic resonance (MR) images. Diagnosing brain tumors in radiology is a significant issue, yet it is a difficult and time-consuming procedure that radiologists must pass through. The reliability of their assessment relies completely on their knowledge and personal judgements which are in most cases inaccurate. As a possible remedy to the growing concern in diagnosing brain tumors accurately, in this work a deep learning method is applied to classify the brain tumor MR images with very high performance accuracy. The research leveraged a transfer learning model known as AlexNet's convolutional neural network (CNN) to perform this operation. Our method helps to improve robustness, efficiencies and accuracy in the healthcare sector with the ability to automate the entire diagnostic process with the overall accuracy of 99.62%. Additionally, our model has the ability to detect and classify tumors at their different stages and magnitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据