4.7 Article

Active knowledge graph completion

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 604, 期 -, 页码 267-279

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.027

关键词

Existential rule learning; Knowledge graph completion; Rule learning; Knowledge graph

资金

  1. Australian Government Department of Finance
  2. Australian National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a novel algorithm, OPRL, for learning Open Path (OP) rules that can generate relevant queries for Knowledge Graph completion, even when there is no closed rule to answer the query. This demonstrates the first solution for active knowledge graph completion.
Enterprise and public Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are known to be incomplete. Methods for automatic completion, sometimes by rule learning, scale well. While previous rule-based methods learn closed (non-existential) rules, we introduce Open Path (OP) rules that are constrained existential rules. We present a novel algorithm, OPRL, for learning OP rules. Closed rules complete a KG by answering queries of unclear origin, usually derived from a holdback test set in experimental settings. However, OP rules can generate relevant queries for KG completion. OPRL generates queries even when there is no closed rule to answer the query, or when the correct answer is a missing entity that is not present in the KG. For OPRL to scale well, we propose a novel embedding-based fitness function to effi-ciently estimate rule quality. Additionally, we introduce a novel, efficient vector computa-tion to formally assess rule quality. We evaluate OPRL using adaptations of Freebase, YAGO2, Wikidata, anda synthetic Poker KG. We find that OPRL mines hundreds of accurate rules from massive KGs with up to 8 M facts. The OP rules generate queries with precision as high as 98% and recall of 62% on a complete KG, demonstrating the first solution for active knowledge graph completion. Crown Copyright (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据