4.7 Article

Spatial-temporal interaction learning based two-stream network for action recognition

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 606, 期 -, 页码 864-876

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.092

关键词

Action recognition; Spatial-temporal; Two-stream CNNs

资金

  1. 2022 Science and Technology grant
  2. Forestry Department, Hunan Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Spatial-Temporal Interaction Learning Two-stream network (STILT) was proposed for action recognition, which utilizes an alternating co attention mechanism between spatial and temporal features to improve recognition accuracy. Experiments showed that the network outperformed state-of-the-art models in action recognition on three widely used datasets.
Two-stream convolutional neural networks have been widely applied to action recognition. However, two-stream networks are usually adopted to capture spatial information and temporal information separately, which normally ignore the strong complementarity and correlation between spatial and temporal information in videos. To solve this problem, we propose a Spatial-Temporal Interaction Learning Two-stream network (STILT) for action recognition. Our proposed two-stream (i.e., a spatial stream and a temporal stream) network has a spatial-temporal interaction learning module, which uses an alternating co attention mechanism between two streams to learn the correlation between spatial features and temporal features. The spatial-temporal interaction learning module allows the two streams to guide each other and then generates optimized spatial attention features and temporal attention features. Thus, the proposed network can establish the interactive connection between two streams, which efficiently exploits the attended spatial and temporal features to improve recognition accuracy. Experiments on three widely used datasets (i.e., UCF101, HMDB51 and Kinetics) show that the proposed network outperforms the state-of-the-art models in action recognition.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据