4.6 Article

Periodic Hierarchical Structures in Poly(p-dioxanone) Modulated with Miscible Diluents: Top-Surface and Interior Analyses

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 30, 页码 11046-11055

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01893

关键词

-

资金

  1. Taiwan?s Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 110-2811-E-006-509-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The morphologies and arrangements of biodegradable polyesters, poly(p-dioxanone) (PPDO) blended with poly(ethylene succinate) (PESu), were studied. Three different types of nuclei were found in the PPDO/PESu blend system, and a novel technique was used to dissect the interior 3D structures of PPDO. The detailed 3D-assembly provides insights into the complexed architectures of this polymer.
Morphologies and top-surface and interior lamellar arrangement of biodegradable polyesters, poly(p-dioxanone) (PPDO) blended with poly(ethylene succinate) (PESu), have been investigated. The PPDO/PESu (75/25) blend system shows three different types of nuclei co-existing at Tc = 75 ?: double-spiral, single-spiral, and concentric rings. For double-spiral spherulites, the lamellae turn into feather-like branches on the ridge which are arranged along the radial direction and then submerge to the valley following bending away to the tangential direction consistent with the spiral direction. On the other hand, the interior structure is composed of both radially oriented lamellae and tangentially oriented lamellae. A novel technique by specimens etching and tilting on sample stages was adopted to dissect into the interior 3D structures PPDO crystallized from the PPDO/PESu blend, wherein stereo-dissection scanning electron microscopy analysis and top-surface atomic-force microscopy characterization are performed on the novel periodic assembly in PPDO. Detailed 3D-assembly is proved by direct morphology dissection evidence for probing the mechanisms of the complexed architectures never reported or discovered before for this polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据