4.6 Article

Hexamethylenetetramine Complexes as Easy-to-Handle and Efficient Lewis Acid-Base Heterogeneous Catalysts for Coupling of CO2 under Mild Conditions

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00254

关键词

-

资金

  1. Project of Hunan Province Education Department [18B379, 20A114]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2018JJ3099]
  3. Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Program [2021SK2038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By synthesizing Lewis acid-base hexamethylenetetramine complexes with multisynergetic effects, the goal of synthesizing cyclic carbonates without solvents or cocatalysts under mild conditions was successfully achieved. The experimental results indicate that the Lewis acidity of the metal and the nucleophilicity of the anions play crucial roles in the catalytic performance.
In terms of the multisynergetic effects among Lewis acid, halogen anions, and Lewis base, a series of Lewis acid-base hexamethylenetetramine complexes with tertiary amines, different metal centers, and halogen anions were conveniently synthesized at room temperature. Hexamethylenetetramine is cheap, nontoxic, rich in tertiary amine, and with a cage structure. This is the first time that the hexamethylenetetramine complexes were used as efficient and stable heterogeneous catalysts for the generation of cyclic carbonates by the coupling reaction of CO2 under relatively mild conditions (60 degrees C, 1.5 MPa, 12 h) with outstanding performance (yield = 98.9%) without use of solvent and cocatalyst. Hatm complexes that are different in nucleophilicity and Lewis acidity are designed and evaluated, which suggest that the stronger Lewis acidity of metal together with stronger nucleophilicity of anions means higher catalytic performance. A plausible multisynergetic mechanism over ZnBr2-Hatm is proposed for the CO2 coupling. In addition, the ZnBr2-Hatm can be conveniently recovered and reused in a test of five times without remarkable decline of activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据