4.6 Article

Simultaneous Removal of SO2 and NO from the Flue Gas of Marine Ships with a Gas Cyclone-Liquid Jet Absorption Separator

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 28, 页码 10233-10242

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01852

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878099]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19DZ1208000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A gas cyclone-liquid jet absorption separator (GLAS) combined with NaClO solution was developed to remove SO2 and NO emitted from marine ships. The results showed that GLAS had high efficiency in pollutant removal, making it a promising technology for marine ships.
SO2 and NO emitted from marine ships have seriously polluted the regional environment. However, there is a lack of high-efficiency, small-size, and cost-effective technology with which these pollutants could be purified. Here, a gas cyclone-liquid jet absorption separator (GLAS) combined with NaClO solution was developed to remove SO2 and NO simultaneously. The high-speed gas that rotates in the GLAS forms a high-gravity field and vortex flow, and SO2 and NO were removed efficiently in a small GLAS. The effect of key operating parameters was well studied through the experiment, and the total mass transfer coefficient (K(G)a) was calculated. It was found that the removal efficiency increased with the absorbent flow rate and concentration, while it decreased with the gas flow rate and the initial SO2 and NO concentrations. Under the experimental conditions, the maximum removal efficiency for SO2 and NO was 99% and 93%, and the maximum K(G)a was 0.0559 and 0.0357 kmol.m(-3).kPa(-1).s(-1), respectively, which were 10 times higher than that of traditional devices. Semiempirical equations were also developed to predict the mass transfer performance of desulfurization and denitrification by GLAS. The study indicates that GLAS combined with NaClO solution has great potential applications for marine ships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据