4.6 Article

Solving Ultrasound Tomography's Inverse Problem: Automating Regularization Parameter Selection

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3182147

关键词

Inverse problems; Scattering; Transducers; Mathematical models; Ultrasonic imaging; Tomography; Iterative methods; Distorted Born iterative (DBI) method; Tikhonov regularization; ultrasound tomography (UT)

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2020-02-2240]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a novel algorithm based on the Tikhonov regularization for choosing a balanced parameter in ultrasound tomography. Compared to other methods, this algorithm provides better image quality in breast cancer detection.
Ultrasound tomography (UT) is a noninvasive procedure that can be used to detect breast cancer. Yet, to accomplish this, reconstruction algorithms must solve an inherent nonlinear, ill-posed inverse problem. One solution is to use the distorted Born iterative (DBI) method. However, in order for successful convergence, ill-posed inverse problems must also be solved for each individual iteration. We used the Tikhonov regularization with different algorithms for choosing the regularization parameter that provides optimal balance, a solution neither overregularized nor underregularized. In this article, we propose a novel algorithm for choosing a balanced parameter based on minimizing two inversely proportional components: signal loss and scaled noise errors (SNEs). This begins with an overestimation of the noise in the measured data, which is then appropriately adjusted within each iteration of the DBI method using the discrepancy between measured and calculated data. We compared our algorithm to the L-curve method, as well as generalized cross-validation (GCV) and projection-based regularized total least-squares (PB-RTLS) methods. Four numerical simulations with varying noise levels and aperture settings showed that our algorithm provided the lowest relative error (RE) for phantom reconstruction, signifying image quality compared to the other methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据