4.7 Article

Distributed Control of DC Grids: Integrating Prosumers' Motives

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 3299-3310

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3109024

关键词

Smart grids; Renewable energy sources; Voltage control; Control systems; Optimization; Transmission line matrix methods; Symmetric matrices; Distributed control; DC power systems; psycho-social factors

资金

  1. EU Project 'MatchIT' [82203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel distributed control strategy to address a psycho-social-physical welfare problem in islanded DC smart grids. By formulating an optimization problem considering technical and physical constraints of the grid and psycho-social factors of prosumers, the proposed strategy enables prosumers to share current with each other. The controller design and the passive interconnection between the physical grid and the controller ensure global asymptotic convergence of the closed-loop system to the desired steady-state, which is confirmed by simulations based on collected data.
In this paper, a novel distributed control strategy addressing a (feasible) psycho-social-physical welfare problem in islanded Direct Current (DC) smart grids is proposed. Firstly, we formulate a (convex) optimization problem that allows prosumers to share current with each other, taking into account the technical and physical aspects and constraints of the grid (e.g., stability, safety), as well as psycho-social factors (i.e., prosumers' personal values). Secondly, we design a controller whose (unforced) dynamics represent the continuous time primal-dual dynamics of the considered optimization problem. Thirdly, a passive interconnection between the physical grid and the controller is presented. Global asymptotic convergence of the closed-loop system to the desired steady-state is proved and simulations based on collected data on psycho-social aspects illustrate and confirm the theoretical results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据