4.8 Article

A Soft Short-Circuit Diagnosis Method for Lithium-Ion Battery Packs in Electric Vehicles

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 8572-8581

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3151620

关键词

Electric vehicles (EV); fault detection; fault diagnosis; fault estimation; H-infinity nonlinear observer; lithium-ion battery (LIB) pack; soft short circuit (SC)

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a battery fault diagnosis method that achieves joint soft short-circuit fault detection and estimation. It constructs a nonlinear observer to estimate the battery's state of charge and soft short-circuit current, and develops a diagnosis algorithm to detect soft short-circuit faults.
The early detection of soft short-circuit (SC) faults in lithium-ion battery packs is critical to enhance electric vehicle safety and prevent catastrophic hazards. This article proposes a battery fault diagnosis method that achieves joint soft SC fault detection and estimation. Specifically, based on an augmented state-space battery model, an H-infinity nonlinear observer is constructed to estimate state of charge (SOC) and soft SC current in the presence of model parameter variations. Then, the asymptotic stability of the estimation error system under the desired H-infinity, performance is formally proved and a tractable observer design criterion is derived. Furthermore, a diagnosis algorithm is developed to detect soft SC faults via checking the difference between the estimated SOC from the observer and the calculated SOC from Coulomb counting. Once a soft SC fault is detected, the algorithm also allows the soft SC resistance to be calculated from the estimated soft SC current. Finally, soft SC experiments of a series-connected battery pack under different working conditions and various SC resistance values are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据