4.7 Article

Ship Collision Avoidance Utilizing the Cross-Entropy Method for Collision Risk Assessment

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3101007

关键词

Uncertainty; Estimation; Marine vehicles; Probabilistic logic; Trajectory; Safety; Risk management; Maritime collision avoidance; autonomous ships; COLREGS; collision probability estimation; collision risk

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway through the Centers of Excellence Funding Scheme [223254]
  2. Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems (AMOS)
  3. Maritime Activities and Offshore Operations (MAROFF) [295033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces a new approach for ship-ship collision probability estimation based on the CE method, as well as the COLAV system considering obstacle uncertainty. Simulation results demonstrate that the PSB-MPC can utilize the CPE for better risk assessment and safer decision-making.
In this article, a new approach for ship-ship collision probability estimation based on the Cross-Entropy (CE) method is introduced, which can be treated as an adaptive importance sampler. It has the advantage of attaining low variance estimates of small collision probabilities, which will most often be the case in realistic scenarios. Furthermore, a risk-based Collision Avoidance (COLAV) system being able to take obstacle kinematic uncertainty and intention uncertainty into account is presented, namely the Probabilistic Scenario-Based Model Predictive Control (PSB-MPC). The collision probability estimator (CPE) is used in the risk assessment of the PSB-MPC, and tested in a simulation study, where the total system is validated. Simulation results show that the MPC is able to utilize the CPE for better risk assessment than the original version, in order to make safer decisions in close quarter situations and cases where nearby obstacles make unexpected maneuvers. It is also shown that when all vessels involved use the PSB-MPC, situations are resolved according to the traffic rules in a safe manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据