4.7 Article

Loop-Closure Detection Using Local Relative Orientation Matching

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3074520

关键词

Loop-closure detection; SLAM; feature matching; place recognition; ASMK

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62003247, 61773295, 61903279]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province [2020BAB113]
  3. Natural Science Fund of Hubei Province [2019CFA037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel appearance-based loop-closure detection (LCD) method is proposed, with a focus on real-time geometrical verification using the local relative orientation matching (LRO) algorithm. The method significantly improves the LCD performance and outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on six publicly available datasets.
Loop-closure detection (LCD), which aims to recognize a previously visited location, is a crucial component of the simultaneous localization and mapping system. In this paper, a novel appearance-based LCD method is presented. In particular, we propose a simple yet surprisingly useful feature matching algorithm for real-time geometrical verification of candidate loop-closures, termed as local relative orientation matching (LRO). It aims to efficiently establish reliable feature correspondences based on preserving local topological structures between the query image and candidate frame. To effectively retrieve candidate loop closures, we introduce the aggregated selective match kernel framework into the LCD task, which can effectively represent images and reduce the quantization noise of the traditional bag-of-words framework. In addition, the SuperPoint neural network is employed to extract reliable interest points and feature descriptors. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our LRO can significantly improve the LCD performance, and the proposed overall LCD method can achieve much better performance over the current state-of-theart on six publicly available datasets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据