4.8 Article

Wind Turbine Power Curve Monitoring Based on Environmental and Operational Data

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 5209-5218

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3128205

关键词

Wind turbines; Analytical models; Wind speed; Wind farms; Data models; Monitoring; Blades; Ensemble methods; multivariate regression; performance analysis; wind energy; wind turbines

资金

  1. University of Perugia [RICBA19MLF]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an ensemble approach based on multivariate polynomial regression models to predict the power production of wind turbines and provide reliable prediction intervals. By considering environmental measurements and multiple models relative to different operative conditions, the effectiveness of the method is validated with low prediction errors.
The power produced by a wind turbine depends on environmental conditions, working parameters, and interactions with nearby turbines. However, these aspects are often neglected in the design of data-driven models for wind farms' performance analysis. In this article, we propose to predict the active power and to provide reliable prediction intervals via ensembles of multivariate polynomial regression models that exploit a higher number of inputs (compared to most approaches in the literature), including operational and thermal variables. We present two main strategies: the former considers the environmental measurements collected at the other wind turbines in the farm as additional modeling information for the turbine under analysis; the latter combines multiple models relative to different operative conditions. We validate our approach on real data from the SCADA system of a wind farm in Italy and obtain a MAE of the order of 1.0% of the rated power of the turbine. Moreover, due to the structure of our approach, we can gain quantitative insights on the covariates most frequently selected depending on the working region of the wind turbines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据