4.8 Article

Med-BERT: A Pretraining Framework for Medical Records Named Entity Recognition

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 5600-5608

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3131180

关键词

Bit error rate; Task analysis; Feature extraction; Informatics; Data models; Transformers; Training; Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT); flat-lattice transformer (FLAT); medical named entity recognition (NER); pretraining model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61976049]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program, China [2019YFG0533, TII-21-2705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the Med-BERT method for improving medical records NER tasks, showing good performance in experiments. The method provides better representations of long medical entities while protecting privacy information, and is essential for clinical decision support systems and medical real-world research.
A large amount of data is generated every day with the development of Internet medical care, which is of great significance for the clinical decision support system and medical real-world research. Medical records named entity recognition (NER) is important on the aforementioned research topics under the premise of protecting patients' private information. In this article, we propose a medical dictionary enhanced bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), dubbed Med-BERT, to achieve better representations of long medical entities. On Med-BERT, we propose a span flat-lattice transformer (Span-FLAT) method on medical records NER, and the entity types include private information such as names and addresses, as well as medical information such as patient symptoms, signs, and diseases. Experimental results on two benchmark medical datasets show the effectiveness of Med-BERT, and the proposed Med-BERT-based Span-FLAT method remarkably outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on medical NER task.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据