4.8 Article

A Novel E-Exponential Stochastic Resonance Model and Weak Signal Detection Method for Steel Wire Rope

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 7428-7440

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3095802

关键词

Signal detection; Mathematical model; Wires; Adaptation models; Analytical models; Nonlinear systems; Signal to noise ratio; E-exponential; nonlinear system; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); steel wire rope (SWR); stochastic resonance (SR); weak signal detection

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M662600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a novel E-exponential SR model and weak signal detection method are proposed for the detection of weak defect signals in steel wire rope. The model is introduced from the perspective of Taylor expansion and nonlinear system analysis, and its performance is evaluated through simulation and analysis. Experimental comparisons and case studies are conducted to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.
Steel wire rope can be frequently damaged by various factors. Although weak defect signal detection is the key to guarantee safety, current classic stochastic resonance (SR) models and methods are unavailable due to the complicated interference of noise. Thus, in this article, a novel E-exponential SR model and weak signal detection method are proposed. The principle of this model is first introduced from the perspective of Taylor expansion and nonlinear system analysis. Then, the model performance is simulated and evaluated by output signal analysis and chaos characterizations. Afterward, model comparison with different system parameters, experiments, and case studies regarding three typical wire rope defects inspection and weak signal recognition is conducted to demonstrate the validity of the novel method. Finally, the advantages and limitations of the proposed SR model are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据