4.8 Article

Consensus Reaching in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making: A Multi-Stage Optimization Feedback Mechanism With Individual Bounded Confidences

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 3333-3346

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3113571

关键词

Biological system modeling; Linguistics; Optimization; Manganese; Current measurement; Psychology; Phase measurement; Bounded confidence; consensus; group decision making (GDM); multi-stage optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71871149, 72001031]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M673146]
  3. Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Planning Project [2020YJ0043]
  4. Spanish State Research Agency [PID2019-103880RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article develops a consensus model based on individual bounded confidences to address the acceptance issue. By designing a consensus measure and an optimization feedback mechanism, it aims to maximize group mutual acceptance and minimize preference adjustment.
Existing consensus models focus on improving the group consensus level, but ignore whether a higher group consensus level means higher mutual acceptance of decision makers. In the field of opinion dynamics, the bounded confidence model asserts that the decision makers will accept the preferences of others within a neighborhood of theirs with width a certain confidence level. Inspired by this research methodology, this article develops a consensus model to address the acceptance issue based on individual bounded confidences. Specifically, a bounded confidence-based consensus measure is designed to measure the level of group mutual acceptance, and a multi-stage optimization feedback mechanism based on individual bounded confidences is proposed to maximize the group mutual acceptance and minimize the amount of preference adjustment. A numerical example and a simulation analysis are included to illustrate the use of the model and to justify its effectiveness, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据