4.6 Article

Temporal Logic Inference for Fault Detection of Switched Systems With Gaussian Process Dynamics

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2021.3074548

关键词

Fault detection; Circuit faults; Switches; Switched systems; Trajectory; Uncertainty; Observers; Fault detection; Gaussian process; partially ordered direction; signal temporal logic (STL); switched system; temporal logic inference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a method for constructing a fault detector using signal temporal logic (STL) formulas for a class of switched nonlinear systems with partially unknown dynamics. The method utilizes a Gaussian process for approximating unknown internal dynamics, and a temporal logic inference algorithm for finding the fault detector with stability guarantees. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method can detect faulty trajectories with a probability guarantee.
In this article, we present a method for constructing the fault detector in the form of signal temporal logic (STL) formulas, which can be understood by human users and formally proven to detect faults with probabilistic satisfaction guarantees, for a class of switched nonlinear systems with partially unknown dynamics. First, the partially unknown internal dynamics are approximated by the Gaussian process with stability guarantees. Second, a novel temporal logic inference algorithm is proposed to find the fault detector, which takes advantage of the internal properties of temporal logic and searches for the optimal formula along a partially ordered direction. Moreover, the algorithm is not allowed for missing faults but allowed for false alarms during the temporal logic inference process. In addition, we simulate finitely many trajectories with Chua's circuit and infer the temporal logic formulas with the Gaussian optimization. The results show that the proposed method can find a temporal logic formula to detect the faulty trajectory with a probability guarantee.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据