4.6 Article

A Compact Dual-Band Dual-Circularly Polarized SIW Cavity-Backed Antenna Array for Millimeter-Wave Applications

期刊

IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 1572-1576

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2022.3174419

关键词

Dual band; Antenna arrays; Resonant frequency; Antennas; Perturbation methods; Impedance matching; Impedance; Cavity-backed; dual-band; dual-circularly polarized; millimeter-wave (mm-Wave); parasitic patch

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20164, 61975177]
  2. NSFC of Anhui Province [KJ2018A0015, K120436040, K120436042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A compact millimeter-wave dual-band dual-circularly polarized antenna based on substrate integrated waveguide is proposed, which achieves good performance by generating different circular polarization signals at different frequency bands through different structural designs, and by tuning and optimizing the matching for better gain and bandwidth.
A compact millimeter-wave (mm-Wave) dual-band dual-circularly polarized (CP) antenna based on substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) cavity-backed structure is proposed in this letter. By introducing the square aperture with two symmetric perturbation notches on the SIW cavity, right-hand CP (RHCP) can be generated at the low frequency band. On this basis, the dumbbell-shaped patch is placed inside the square aperture to generate left-hand CP (LHCP) at the high frequency band. To optimize the impedance matching and adjust resonant frequency, stacked parasitic patches are adopted. In addition, the two shorted vias are introduced to realize the independent tuning of high frequency band. The measured results show that the array achieves the impedance bandwidths of 7.3% and 7.5%, AR bandwidths of 2.8% and 2.6%, with gains of 18.2 and 18.5 dBic at 28 and 38 GHz, respectively. The proposed array will be a potential candidate component for 5G mm-Wave full-duplex wireless communication systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据