4.5 Article

The impact of a shadows scheme on a Mars mesoscale climate model

期刊

ICARUS
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115036

关键词

Mars Mars; climate Mars; surface Experimental techniques

资金

  1. Open University's School of Physical Sciences
  2. UK Space Agency [ST/R001405/1, ST/V005332/1, ST/T002913/1]
  3. UK Space Agency [ST/T002913/1, ST/V005332/1, ST/R001405/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Latitude and topography influence shadow casting, affecting the stability of water, ice, or snow on the landscape. In a Mars climate model, incorporating a shadow scheme and understanding its interaction with relevant variables is crucial. This study added a shadow scheme to a Mars model and investigated its impact on surface temperature and the presence of surface water ice in the Lyot crater area. The results showed that simulating shadows increased the predicted surface ice amount by up to 83%, with the greatest differences observed in shadowed regions.
Latitude and topography affect the amount of shadow cast on a landscape, which in turn can influence where water, ice or snow are stable. For martian climate models, whose output sometimes disagrees with observational data, we show that adding the ability to represent shadows generated by topography and understanding how they interact with relevant modelled variables can be important. We included a shadows scheme in a Mars mesoscale climate model and report on the impact that shadows had on surface temperature, and the resultant impact on one variable - surface water ice, and its accumulation or ablation in the study area of Lyot crater. Incorporating a scheme simulating shadows cast by topographical features had a measurable effect, increasing by up to 83% the amount of surface ice that the model predicted would be found in shadowed areas. The largest differences in ice content between simulations with and without shadows were found in those areas with the greatest amount of shadow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据