4.6 Article

Elasto-plastic material model of oak at two moisture content levels

期刊

HOLZFORSCHUNG
卷 76, 期 10, 页码 886-896

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/hf-2022-0008

关键词

elasto-plastic; finite element method; material model; moisture conten; oak

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Youth and Sports in Czech Republic [LL1909]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to develop an accurate orthotropic elasto-plastic model for oak wood that can be used in finite element analysis, taking into account different moisture levels. Through experimental validation and error calibration, numerical material models were successfully developed to predict the oak's elasto-plastic response.
The mechanical properties of wood show a very high dependence on the moisture content (MC). A consideration of MC in numerical simulations increases the applicability of such prediction with respect to application and moisture states of the wood material. The goal of this work is to develop an accurate orthotropic elasto-plastic model for oak wood (Quercus robur L.) at two different MC levels applicable for finite element analysis (FEA). To achieve this goal, the following steps were carried out: (a) in-house standard specimens tests in compression, tension, and shear and in all three orthogonal directions, followed by three-point bending, where all specimens were conditioned to a 12 and 25.6% MC, prior to the mechanical test; (b) integration of all obtained material characteristics into the consistent numerical material models; (c) validation of the developed material models by comparing the numerically predicted values with the experimental ones; and (d) iterative calibration of the material models by adjusting the individual material characteristics to minimize error using a reference. Material models were successfully developed with the following mean relative errors: 5.2% for 12% MC and 5.8% for 25.6% MC, respectively. Both numerical material models consistently predicted the oak elasto-plastic response that can be easily integrated into any FEA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据