4.3 Article

A Practical Method for EPR Dosimetry Using Alanine Powder

期刊

HEALTH PHYSICS
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 325-331

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001588

关键词

operational topics; dosimetry; alanine powder; EPR spectroscopy

资金

  1. NSERC-UNENE Industrial Research Chair in Health Physics and Environmental Safety, Senior Chair [IRCPJ 372231-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the feasibility of using alanine powder as a standardized dosimeter for the alanine-EPR system. A calibration curve was produced and the dosimetric signal showed linear behavior with good repeatability.
This work investigates alanine powder, an inexpensive and versatile material compared to alanine pellets, as a standardized dosimeter for the alanine-EPR system using a Bruker EMX-Micro spectrometer. The feasibility of this method was investigated, and a calibration curve was produced using 40 dosimeters, which were prepared by tightly packing DL-alanine powder in polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes. The dosimeters were irradiated to doses ranging from 0.2-20 Gy using a Co-60 source. A dosimeter handling and measurement protocol was established for all dosimeters. The dosimetric signal was evaluated by measuring the peak-to-peak height of the central resonance peak, and the dose response of alanine powder dosimeters showed a linear behavior in the investigated dose range with relative errors below 13%. Measurement repeatability and reproducibility were tested to show the errors associated with sample placement in the cavity and with the overall measurement method, with both tests showing relative errors below 7%. As an inexpensive material compared to pellet dosimeters, alanine powder has a strong potential to be used as a standardized material for radiation dosimetry applications. The scope of this work is to present an effective and comprehensive methodology with accompanying analysis scripts for dosimetry with alanine powder that is useful in a wide range of applications and dose requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据