4.0 Article

Understanding the Evolution of Groundwater-Contaminant Plume Chemistry Emanating from Legacy Contaminant Sources: An Example from a Long-Term Crude Oil Spill

期刊

GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 30-42

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12536

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a comprehensive investigation into the groundwater chemistry of residual hydrocarbon source zones in different stages of aging. The results show a direct relationship between benzene and naphthalene concentrations in residual oil and water samples collected below the oil. The chemical composition of groundwater associated with oil near the spill site differs from that associated with oil spread downgradient, indicating a shift in biodegradation reactions. These findings highlight the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of source zone processes.
Understanding the evolution of plumes emanating from residual hydrocarbon contaminant sources requires evaluating how changes in source compositions over time cause changes in dissolved plume chemistry as residual sources age. This study investigates such changes at the site of a 1979 crude-oil pipeline spill and is the first comprehensive look at groundwater chemistry associated with a residual hydrocarbon source zones in different stages of aging. The data show a direct relationship between concentrations of benzene and naphthalene in the residual oil and those measured in water samples collected below the oil. Groundwater associated with oil near the spill site had different chemical composition compared with water associated with oil that had spread downgradient from the spill zone, indicating a shift in biodegradation reactions. These results emphasize that source zone processes are spatially and temporally heterogeneous and should be accounted for in natural attenuation studies where residual source zones persist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据