4.7 Article

Pre-Activation of Ice Nucleating Particles in Deposition Nucleation Mode: Evidence From Measurement Using a Static Vacuum Water Vapor Diffusion Chamber in Xinjiang, China

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099468

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190777, BK20190778]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42005064, 41905124]
  3. Northwestern Region's Weather Modification Capacity Building Project [ZQC-R18211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the pre-activation of ice nucleating particles (INPs) in deposition mode and finds that pre-activated INPs can enhance ice generation in mixed-phase clouds. The activation efficiency of INPs is increased after pre-activation, even at relatively warm temperatures such as -10 degrees C. This research provides important evidence for understanding and predicting cloud and precipitation processes.
Pre-activation of ice nucleating particles (INPs) is a potential mechanism to enhance ice generation in mixed-phase clouds, but evidence of INP pre-activation is still limited. In this study, the pre-activation of INPs in deposition mode is investigated using refreezing experiments in a static vacuum water vapor diffusion chamber with aerosols sampled in Xinjiang, China. The results indicate that the activation efficiency of INP was enhanced after pre-activation. Statistically, the INP concentration increased by 266%, 112%, and 70% at -10 degrees C, -14 degrees C, and -17 degrees C after pre-activation, and more than half of the samples showed an increase in INP concentration. The increase in INP concentration has a positive correlation with the primary INP concentration before pre-activation. The analyses provide new evidence that the pre-activated INPs can act as better nuclei at temperature as warm as -10 degrees C, and highlight the importance to find a way to consider this mechanism in models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据