4.7 Article

MagNet: Automated Magnetic Mineral Grain Morphometry Using Convolutional Neural Network

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099118

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society-Newton Advanced Fellowship - National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) [42061130214]
  2. Royal Society-Newton Advanced Fellowship - RS [NAF\R1\201096]
  3. NSFC [41974074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a machine learning framework called MagNet for automated recognition and classification of magnetic mineral grains in microscopic images. The framework performs well in identifying and classifying magnetofossil nanoparticles and can be extended to process different types of mineral images. This tool is important for extracting key quantitative information of magnetic mineral populations within diverse samples for interpreting Earth and planetary processes.
Morphometry (i.e., the quantitative determination of grain size and shape information) is an essential component of all rock and environmental magnetic studies. Electron microscopy is often used to image magnetic mineral grains, but the current lack of systematic image processing tools makes it challenging to quantify key morphological features of magnetic minerals in natural samples. Here, we present an easy-to-use machine learning framework MagNet for automated morphological recognition of magnetic mineral grains in microscopic images. This framework, based on a convolutional neural network, performs well in the recognition and classification of magnetofossil nanoparticles in transmission electron microscopy images after training and testing. MagNet is open-source and can easily be extended to process different types of mineral images. This tool has the potential, therefore, to extract key quantitative information of magnetic mineral populations within heterogeneous terrestrial and meteoritic samples for the interpretations of Earth and planetary processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据