4.7 Article

Single-Crystal Elasticity of Antigorite at High Pressures and Seismic Detection of Serpentinized Slabs

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099411

关键词

serpentine; elasticity; Brillouin spectroscopy; antigorite; seismic anisotropy; shear wave splitting

资金

  1. IRTG Deep Earth Volatile Cycles [GRK 2156/1]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme (ERC) [864877]
  3. DFG [KU 3447/1]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [864877] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study experimentally determined the complete single-crystal elasticity of antigorite and used the results to model the seismic properties of antigorite-bearing rocks. The study showed that seismic shear anisotropy has a low sensitivity to serpentinization, making it challenging to detect serpentinized slabs using seismological approaches.
The subduction of serpentinized slabs is the dominant process to transport water into Earth's mantle, and plays a pivotal role for subduction dynamics. Antigorite, the most abundant serpentine mineral in subduction settings, may imprint a seismic signature on serpentinized slabs, making them seismically distinguishable from the dry, non-serpentinized ones. However, the complete single-crystal elasticity of antigorite has not been experimentally constrained at high pressures, hindering the use of seismological approaches to detect serpentinization in subducting slabs. Here, we report the full elastic stiffness tensor of antigorite by single-crystal Brillouin spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction up to 7.71(5) GPa. We use our results to model seismic properties of antigorite-bearing rocks and show that their seismological detectability depends on the geometrical relation between seismic wave paths and foliation of serpentinized rocks. In particular, we demonstrate that seismic shear anisotropy shows low sensitivity to serpentinization for a range of relevant geometries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据