4.6 Article

A recursive matched-filter to systematically explore volcanic long-period earthquake swarms

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 231, 期 2, 页码 912-920

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggac221

关键词

Antarctica; Earthquake dynamics; Seismicity and tectonics; Volcano seismology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation under EAR award [2103408]
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [2103408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a recursive matched-filter approach for detecting earthquake swarms. By selecting new template events for matched-filter search, the spatial coverage of the template set can be progressively extended. This method is suitable for systematically exploring earthquake swarms in both volcanic and tectonic contexts.
The matched-filter technique is an effective way to detect repeats, or near-repeats, of a seismic source, but prior identification of an event from that source to use as a template is required. We propose a recursive matched-filter approach to systematically explore earthquake swarms, here applied to a swarm of volcanic long-period seismicity beneath Mount Sidley in Antarctica. We start with a single visually chosen template event with a high signal-to-noise ratio. We then extend our template database by selecting new templates to use in a subsequent matched-filter search from the newly detected set of events, allowing us to recursively expand the number of templates. We demonstrate that each iteration of the matched-filter search progressively extends the spatial coverage of our set of templates away from the original template event. In such a way, our proposed method overcomes the matched-filter search's strictest constraint: that an event must already be identified to detect other similar events. Our recursive matched-filtering approach is well suited for the systematic exploration of earthquake swarms in both volcanic and tectonic contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据