4.7 Article

Extreme erosion by submarine slides

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 1130-1134

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G50164.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) [20160822019161]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) National Capability CLASS (Climate Linked Atlantic Sector Science) Programme [NE/R015953/1]
  3. NERC [NE/T002034/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Submarine slides are major geohazards that can trigger tsunamis and damage submarine infrastructure. Our study quantified the erosive potential of submarine slides and found that the slide volume tends to increase after the initial failure. This has important implications for hazard assessments and impact assessments of submarine infrastructure.
Submarine slides (including slides, slumps, and debris flows) pose major geohazards by triggering tsunami and damaging essential submarine infrastructure. Slide volume, a key parameter in hazard assessments, can increase markedly through substrate and/or water entrainment. However, the erosive potential of slides is uncertain. We quantified slide erosivity by determining the ratio of deposited (V-d) to initially evacuated (V-e) sediment volumes; i.e., slides that gain volume through erosion have V-d/V-e ratio >1. We applied this method to the Gorgon slide, a large (500 km(3)), seismically imaged slide offshore northwestern Australia, and reviewed V-d/V-e ratios for 11 other large slides worldwide. Nine of the 11 slides have V-d/V-e > 1 (median value = 2), showing emplaced volumes increased after initial failure. The Gorgon slide is the most erosive slide currently documented (V-d/V-e = 13), possibly reflecting its passage across a highly erodible carbonate ooze substrate. Our new approach to quantifying erosion is important for hazard assessments given substrate-flow interactions control slide speed and runout distance. The variations in slide volume also have important implications for submarine infrastructure impact assessments, including more robust tsunami modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据