4.0 Article

Healed injury in a nektobenthic trilobite: Octopus-like predatory style in Middle Ordovician?

期刊

GEOLOGIA CROATICA
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 189-198

出版社

CROATIAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DOI: 10.4154/gc.2022.17

关键词

Trace fossils; Palaeopathology; Praedichnia; Barrandian area; Prague Basin; Czech Republic

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Lower Paleozoic sediments of the Barrandian area in the Czech Republic are famous worldwide for their well-preserved skeletal marine fauna, including abundant trilobite remains. Researchers have discovered several morphologically abnormal trilobite exoskeletons from Cambrian to Devonian sediments, with one exceptionally well-preserved example from the Ordovician showing a palaeopathological anomaly in its pygidium. The anomaly is interpreted as a healed traumatic injury caused by a failed predatory attack, potentially by a large cephalopod or an unknown arthropod during the trilobite's soft-shelled stage.
The Lower Paleozoic sediments of the Barrandian area are globally renowned as a classical example of well-preserved skeletal marine fauna, including abundant remains of trilobites. Several tens of morphologically anomalous exoskeletons of trilobites have been collected and documented from Cambrian to Devonian clastic sediments and carbonates. One of them, an exceptionally well preserved, articulated and partly enrolled exoskeleton of the Ordovician nektobenthic trilobite Parabarrandia bohemica (NOVAK, 1884) exhibits a prominent palaeopathological anomaly in its pygidium. We interpret this anomaly as a healed traumatic injury and attribute this damage to a failed predatory attack. The subsequently healed injury is classified as the ichnogenus Oichnus BROMLEY, 1981. The structure on the pygidium is strongly reminiscent of injuries caused by octopods and a large cephalopod is proposed as a potential durophagous predator responsible for the herein described trilobite injury. However, an attack from an unknown arthropod while the trilobite was in a soft-shelled stage cannot be excluded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据