4.4 Article

Damage development in woven carbon fibre thermoplastic laminates with PPS and PEEK matrices: A comparative study

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 637-647

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998316653460

关键词

Textile composites; thermoplastic matrices; damage development; acoustic emission; fracture toughness; compression after impact

资金

  1. FP7 NMP program under the M-RECT project Multiscale reinforcement of the semi-crystalline thermoplastic sheets and honeycombs [246067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we investigate the effect of the matrix on the mechanical performance of woven carbon fibre composites. More specifically, composites with the same 5-harness satin carbon fabric reinforcement and different thermoplastic matrices, PPS and PEEK, are compared in various mechanical tests (tensile, interlaminar fracture toughness and compression-after-impact tests). The results of tension tests show the influence of the matrix type on the development of cracks in yarns. The cracks in carbon fabric/PEEK composite appear later than in carbon fabric/PPS composite. Their density is also lower. A correlation between cumulative acoustic emission energy and transverse crack appearance in tensile tests is shown. The most evident difference is demonstrated for the Double Cantilever Beam tests and End Notch Flexure tests. The interlaminar fracture toughness for both mode I and mode II is more than 1.5 times higher for carbon fabric/PEEK laminates as compared to carbon fabric/PPS ones. The higher fracture toughness of carbon fabric/PEEK results in its higher residual compressive strength after impact (approximate to 25%). Thus, the study concludes that the performance of textile composites is highly sensitive to the performance of the matrix. Matrices that have higher strength, ductility and fracture toughness lead to structural composites with lower crack densities, better performance in the bias direction, higher resistance to delaminations and higher residual strength after impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据