4.6 Article

Deacetylation kinetics of promising energy crops, hemp and kenaf, for cellulosic ethanol production

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 1150-1161

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12992

关键词

acetic acid; cellulosic ethanol; hemp; kenaf; lignocellulosic biomass; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; xylose fermentation

资金

  1. Rural Development Administration [PJ01577003]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2022R1I1A1A01072158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that alkaline deacetylation prior to acid pretreatment is effective in improving fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Acetate inhibition can be overcome by this treatment, resulting in increased ethanol productivity.
Lignocellulosic hydrolysates contain acetic acid derived from hemicellulose. Acetate released during acid pretreatment interferes with enzymatic saccharification of the biomass and inhibits yeast fermentation, caused by cellular oxidation and stress. This study used alkaline deacetylation prior to acid pretreatment and evaluated its influence on the fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using two different lignocellulosic biomasses, hemp (Cannabis sativa) and kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus). They are valuable for biofuel production. The maximal acetate removal with minimal sugar loss was obtained with 1% (w/v) NaOH treatment for both biomasses. Deacetylation pretreatment under this condition was effective both in enzymatic saccharification and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. This resulted in improved ethanol production by xylose-consuming yeast (S. cerevisiae SR8) by removing 4.7 g/L of acetate from hemp and 6.3 g/L from kenaf, thus resulting in the ethanol productivities of 0.79 and 0.67 g/L-h from hemp and kenaf, respectively. This suggests that strategies to overcome acetate inhibition are necessary to efficiently use the lignocellulosic biomass as a source for bioenergy production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据