4.7 Article

Deadline-constrained energy-aware workflow scheduling in geographically distributed cloud data centers

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2022.02.018

关键词

Energy cost; Electricity price; Task scheduling; DVFS; Geographically distributed cloud data & nbsp;centers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11974290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing concern over the energy cost of cloud data centers has led to the urgent problem of minimizing energy cost. This paper proposes a DEWS algorithm that addresses the challenge of scheduling workflow tasks in geographically distributed data centers to minimize energy costs. The algorithm includes task sequencing, data center searches, task sequence adjustment, and VM searching with DVFS, resulting in a 5%-20% reduction in energy cost.
The energy cost of cloud data centers is increasingly concerned worldwide; the minimization of energy cost is becoming an urgent problem. Considering data centers are geographically distributed, electricity prices are different in each data center. Consequently, it is also critical to assign workflow tasks to the geographically distributed data centers because data required by tasks is usually conserved in the given data center. So, as electricity prices and data transmission times change, it becomes a big challenge to minimize energy costs when scheduling workflow tasks to heterogeneous servers in cloud data centers. A DEWS (Deadline-constrained Energy-aware Workflow Scheduling) algorithm is proposed in this paper, which consists of task sequencing, VND-based data center searches, task sequence adjustment, and VM searching with Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling (DVFS). The DVFS method is included in the optimization procedure to cut down the additional energy cost of service providers. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the compared algorithms and reduces energy cost by 5%-20%. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据