4.7 Article

Waste cooking oil biodiesel and petroleum diesel soot from diesel bus: A comparison of morphology, nanostructure, functional group composition and oxidation reactivity

期刊

FUEL
卷 321, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124019

关键词

Biodiesel; Particulate matter; Morphology; Nanostructure parameters; Oxidation activity

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16DZ1203000, 18DZ1202802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying the properties of particles emitted from waste cooking oil (WCO) biodiesel and petroleum diesel, it was found that WCO biodiesel particles have higher content of oxygen-containing surface functional groups and carbon atom hybrid ratio, making them easier to be oxidized.
Biodiesel is one of carbon neutral fuels for diesel engine and waste cooking oil (WCO) would be the most viable source for biodiesel production in China. This paper studied the micromorphology, nanostructure, surface functional group composition, and oxidation activity characteristics of particles emitted from a China V bus fueled by pure WCO biodiesel and petroleum diesel, respectively. Compared with petroleum diesel, the results showed that particle mass (PM) and particle number (PN) of WCO biodiesel decreased by 38.66% and 38.12%, respectively, while the proportion of nucleation mode particles increased by about 10%. The soot particles of WCO biodiesel have higher disordered nanostructure, smaller primary particle size and fringe length, larger fringe separation distance and tortuosity, and lower graphitization degree than those of petroleum diesel. Moreover, the oxygen-containing surface functional groups content and carbon atom hybrid ratio of soot par-ticles of WCO biodiesel were higher than those of petroleum diesel under the same oxidation temperature. And then the activation energy of soot particles from WCO biodiesel which contained more lattice defect structures was 38.43 kJ/mol, 37.8% lower than petroleum diesel, which is easier to be oxidized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据