4.7 Article

Adsorption of CO2 onto zeolite ZSM-5: Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies

期刊

FUEL
卷 321, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124097

关键词

CO2; Zeolite; Isotherms; Adsorption kinetics; LDF

资金

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project [PNURSP2022R56]
  2. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this research is to evaluate the adsorption isotherms and kinetics of CO2 on zeolite ZSM-5. The Langmuir model provided the best fit for CO2 adsorption, indicating that it is a spontaneous and exothermic process. The kinetics of CO2 adsorption on the adsorbent were found to be influenced by temperature and pressure. The results can be utilized in CO2 separation and adsorption system performance evaluation.
The aim of this research is to evaluate the adsorption isotherms and the adsorption kinetics of CO2 on the zeolite ZSM-5. The sample was identified by FTIR, SEM, DRX, and N2 adsorption-desorption. The O-2 adsorption isotherms of the adsorbent were evaluated at three temperature 318, 308 and 298 K with a volumetric method. Langmuir and Freundlich models were employed to fit the CO2 adsorption. The Langmuir model represented the best fit against the experimental data with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.99. The calculated thermodynamics parameters like Entropy, Enthalpy and Gibbs Free Energy showed that CO2 adsorption is a spontaneous and exothermic process. The CO2 adsorption kinetics curves on the adsorbent were calculated and then correlated with the linear driving force (LDF) model. The results showed that the mass transfer constants of CO2 adsorption on the adsorbent increased with rising of temperature. Moreover, the activation energy of CO2 adsorption on the adsorbent decreases with rising of pressure. Through adsorption technology, the obtained results can be applied to the CO2 separation and to evaluate the performance of CO2 adsorption systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据