4.6 Article

Evaluating environmental DNA metabarcoding as a survey tool for unionid mussel assessments

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 67, 期 9, 页码 1483-1507

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13955

关键词

biodiversity assessment; conservation biology; high-throughput sequencing; non-invasive survey; species assemblages

资金

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  2. Ohio Department of Transportation
  3. Stantec, Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freshwater unionid mussels play a critical role in maintaining freshwater ecosystems, but are heavily imperiled. Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers potential benefits for monitoring these mussels, and this study compared eDNA metabarcoding with traditional methods. The results showed that eDNA could detect a high percentage of sampled species and provide similar estimates of mussel abundances and diversity compared to traditional methods. This demonstrates the practicality of eDNA metabarcoding as a supplemental sampling method for studying diverse mussel communities and improving the detection of threatened species.
Freshwater unionid mussels are a taxa-rich group of bivalves that play a critical role in maintaining freshwater ecosystems, but are heavily imperilled due to anthropogenic influences. Environmental DNA (eDNA) provides potential benefits for the monitoring of unionids through higher detection sensitivity, lower costs, less intrusion on the environment, and added advantages for sampling challenging and remote habitats. We compare an extensive mussel rescue survey conducted as part of the demolition of a dam with the detection of mussels using eDNA metabarcoding. The unique mussel rescue survey provided a rare opportunity for an in-depth analysis of unionid eDNA detection across both small sampling cells and a large sampling region. Environmental DNA detected 22 of the 24 (91.67%) species sampled in the rescue survey, with the two absent species found as only single individuals. A species missed by the rescue survey was detected with eDNA (Potamilus alatus), along with hidden cryptic diversity within the genus Pyganodon. Both survey methods detected the presence of two federally listed species from multiple sampling cells (Plethobasus cyphyus and Theliderma cylindrica). Furthermore, eDNA provided similar estimates of relative mussel abundances across the sampling region. Estimates of mussel diversity were similar between the two methods, and eDNA successfully detected the two federally listed species present. These results contribute to the growing knowledge of eDNA-based biological assessments and provide valuable insight into comparing sampling effort and detection rates from conventional and eDNA survey methods. As eDNA collection can widen the traditional sampling season and improve the ability to sample difficult or dangerous environments, these results demonstrate the practicality of eDNA metabarcoding as a supplemental sampling method to describe diverse mussel communities and improve the detection of threatened and endangered species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据