4.7 Article

Effect of oxidation on the process of thermal gelation of chicken breast myofibrillar protein

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132368

关键词

Myofibrillar proteins; Oxidation; Thermal gel formation; Water-holding capacity

资金

  1. Nanjing Xiaozhuang University [2018NXY53]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-41]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Agri-culture
  4. postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effect of protein oxidation on the thermal gelation process of chicken breast myofibrillar proteins (MPs). Lower degrees of oxidation promoted the formation of beta-sheet and beta-turn structures, resulting in improved water-holding capacity (WHC) during thermal gelation. In contrast, higher oxidation levels led to decreased WHC and increased formation of free water, with high temperatures exacerbating these negative effects.
In this study, the effect of protein oxidation on the thermal gelation of chicken breast myofibrillar proteins (MPs) was investigated. MP samples treated with different degrees of oxidation were heated (1.5 degrees C/min) to different end-point temperatures to simulate the thermal gelation process. The results showed that the water-holding capacity (WHC) significantly decreased with increasing temperature, and higher oxidation degree resulted in worse WHC of heat-induced gel. Compared with high degrees of oxidation, low degrees of MP oxidation reduced the migration of immobile water, inhibited its release as free water, enhanced WHC and favored the formation of beta-sheet and beta-turn structures. Therefore, low oxidation promoted the formation of beta-sheet and beta-turn structures to form a better gel microstructure with less formation of free water on the thermal gelation and therefore increased the WHC. High oxidation was just the opposite, and high temperature aggravated this negative effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据