4.7 Article

Comparative analysis on the immunoregulatory roles of ferritin M in hybrid fish (Carassius cuvieri ♀ x Carassius auratus red var ♂) and its parental species after bacterial infection

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 197-210

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2022.05.039

关键词

Hybrid fish; Ferritin M; Innate immunity; Bacterial infection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China, China [31902363]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, China [2021JJ40340]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that ferritin M in hybrid fish showed a similar immune defense against bacterial infection compared to its parental species, which may have implications for disease control in future fish farming.
Ferritin M is involved in the regulation of fish immunity. In this study, open reading frame (ORF) sequences of ferritin M from hybrid fish and its parental species were 534 bp. Tissue-specific analysis indicated that the highest level of ferritin M from red crucian carp was observed in kidney, while peaked expressions of ferritin M from white crucian carp and hybrid carp were observed in gill. Elevated levels of ferritin M from hybrid carp and its parental species were detected in immune-related tissues following Aeromonas hydrophila infection or in cultured fish cell lines after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. Ferritin M overexpression could attenuate NF-kappa B and TNF alpha promoter activity in their respective fish cells. Purified ferritin M fusion proteins elicited in vitro binding activity to A. hydrophila and Edwardsiella tarda, lowered bacterial dissemination to tissues and alleviated inflammatory response. Furthermore, treatment with ferritin M fusion proteins could mitigate bacteria-induced liver damage and rescue antioxidant activity. These results suggested that ferritin M in hybrid fish showed a similar immune defense against bacteria infection in comparison with those of its parental species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据