4.7 Article

Water productivity of forage sorghum in response to winter cover crops in semi-arid irrigated conditions

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108552

关键词

Cover cropping; Soil water extraction; Evapotranspiration; Crop water productivity

类别

资金

  1. USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture?s Agriculture and Food Research Initiative [2018-2018-68002-28109]
  2. [GR0005842]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forage sorghum is a suitable alternative to corn silage in water-limited environments, with similar yield potential but less water input. Cover cropping can further improve forage sorghum yield and water productivity, making it the best alternative forage crop for arid and semi-arid regions.
Forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is a suitable alternative for corn silage in water-limited environments due to its similar yield potential as corn but with less water input. Cover cropping could further improve forage sorghum yield and water productivity, making it the best alternative forage crop for arid and semi-arid regions. This two-year study evaluated the effect of fallow and cover crops on soil volumetric water content (VWC), soil water extraction, changes in soil water storage (Delta S), seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ETseasonal), cropping system evapotranspiration (ETsystem), seasonal crop water productivity (CWPseasonal), cropping system water productivity (CWPsystem) and forage sorghum yield under a no-till semi-arid irrigated condition. Treatments included three winter cover crop mixtures: grasses + brassicas + legumes (GBL), grasses + brassicas (GB), grasses + legumes (GL), and a no-cover crop control (fallow), arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Cover crops significantly reduced soil VWC at the beginning and up to 30 days after sorghum planting (DAP). However, at 60 DAP, the VWC was mostly similar among all treatments, and at 90 DAP, it was 17-21% higher under the cover crop treatments than fallow. The ETseasonal was 22-26% higher under cover crops than fallow during cover crop growth, but it was 12-13% greater under fallow than the cover crops during forage sorghum growth. Total soil water extraction at sorghum harvest was 8-89% higher under fallow than cover crops treatments. Averaged across years, cover crop biomass yield was 11% greater with the GBL mixture than the GB and GL mixtures. Forage sorghum yield was 23%, 32%, and 18% higher under GBL, GB, and GL cover crop mixtures, respectively, than fallow. Compared to fallow, cover crop mixtures improved sorghum CWP by 38-43%. Results indicated that forage sorghum yield and CWP under semi-arid irrigated systems could be substantially improved with winter cover cropping than leaving the land fallow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据