4.7 Article

Decision framework with integrated methods for group decision-making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy context and unknown weights

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117082

关键词

Attitude-based entropy; Group decision-making; Muirhead mean; Regret theory; WASPAS approach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a new decision-making approach that calculates weights and aggregates preferences by considering factors such as attitude, regret/rejoice, and variance. The approach also uses the WASPAS method to rank objects. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a numerical example and compared to existing studies to show its superiority.
A hesitant fuzzy set is a flexible generalization of a fuzzy set that permits agents to furnish multiple views and the occurrence probability of each element is either the same or unknown. However, in our day-to-day problems, such an assumption is always narrow. The researchers state a concept of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) to handle this. Based on the previous studies on PHFS, specific gaps can be identified, such as (i) agents' weights are not methodically determined, (ii) approaches for criteria weights do not consider criteria interrelationship and the importance of agents, (iii) preferences are aggregated without considering the agents' discrimination factors, risk appetite, and interdependencies, (iv) Broad/moderate rank values with reduced rank reversal phenomenon during prioritization is not taken. To overcome these drawbacks, in this article, we presented a new decision- making approach in which an attitude-based Shannon entropy and regret/rejoice approach is utilized to calculate the criteria and agents' weights, respectively. Further, a variance-based Muirhead mean operator is proposed by considering the interdependencies and variations to aggregate the different preferences represented in PHFS. Finally, an approach based on the WASPAS (Weighted Arithmetic Sum Product Assessment) method is presented to rank the different objects. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a numerical example and compares their results with the several existing studies' results to reveal the framework's superiority.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据