4.6 Article

A novel mouse model of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma revealed the combined effect of mogamulizumab with psoralen and ultraviolet a therapy

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 1693-1698

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14641

关键词

cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; mogamulizumab; mycosis fungoides; PUVA therapy; xenograft model

资金

  1. Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new mouse model of CTCL was developed to evaluate the efficacy of PUVA therapy, and the combination treatment of PUVA and mogamulizumab showed greater antitumor activity than either monotherapy.
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Topical or systemic treatment with psoralen, such as 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP), followed by ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation (PUVA therapy) is an effective phototherapy for early-stage MF. However, the efficacy of PUVA therapy for advanced-stage MF is not satisfactory, and the ideal combination partner for PUVA therapy has not yet been found. In this study, we developed a new mouse model of CTCL in which efficacy of PUVA was detected and further evaluated the efficacy of combination treatment of PUVA and mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody. Cytotoxicity of PUVA therapy against HH cells, a CTCL cell line, was observed in vitro. The cytotoxicity was dependent on both 8-MOP and UVA. Using HH cells, we developed a mouse model in which HH cells were subcutaneously inoculated in the ear. In this model, PUVA therapy suppressed tumour growth with statistical significance, while 8-MOP or UVA alone did not. Combination therapy of PUVA and mogamulizumab showed greater antitumor activity than either monotherapy with statistical significance. In the histological analysis of the tumour tissue, PUVA accelerated tumour necrosis and then induced the infiltration inflammatory cells in the necrotic area, suggesting that these cells served as effector cells for mogamulizumab. This combination therapy is expected to be a beneficial option for CTCL therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据