4.5 Article

Monkeypox: another test for PCR

期刊

EUROSURVEILLANCE
卷 27, 期 32, 页码 -

出版社

EUR CENTRE DIS PREVENTION & CONTROL
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.32.2200497

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK government Department for Business, Energy& Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  2. Pan-African Network on Emerging and Re-emerging Infections (PANDORA-ID-NET) - European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
  3. National Institutes of Health Research senior investigator award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monkeypox has been declared a global public health emergency by the WHO, with a large number of cases reported worldwide. Public health authorities are taking proactive measures to contain its spread and calling for PCR accuracy to support public health decision making.
Monkeypox was declared a public health emer-gency of international conc ern by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 23 July 2022. Between 1 January and 23 July 2022, 16,016 laboratory confirmed cases of monkeypox and five deaths were reported to WHO from 75 countries on all continents. Public health authorities are proactively identifying cases and trac-ing their contacts to contain its spread. As with COVID-19, PCR is the only method capable of being deployed at sufficient speed to provide timely feedback on any public health interventions. However, at this point, there is little information on how those PCR assays are being standardised between laboratories. A likely reason is that testing is still limited on a global scale and that detection, not quantification, of monkeypox virus DNA is the main clinical requirement. Yet we should not be complacent about PCR performance. As testing requirements increase rapidly and specimens become more diverse, it would be prudent to ensure PCR accuracy from the outset to support harmonisa-tion and ease regulatory conformance. Lessons from COVID-19 should aid implementation with appropriate material, documentary and methodological standards offering dynamic mechanisms to ensure testing that most accurately guides public health decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据