4.5 Article

Gene expression profiling of granule cells and Purkinje cells in the zebrafish cerebellum

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 525, 期 7, 页码 1558-1585

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.24114

关键词

RNA-seq; cerebellar gene enrichment; cerebellum-like structures; RRID:ZIRC_ZL1; RRID:AB_10013361; RRID:SCR_001370; RRID:SCR_001120

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Technology (MEXT) [4370088, 25440104, 16K18548, 25111709, 26115512]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26115512, 25111709, 16K18548, 25440104] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure of the neural circuitry of the cerebellum, which functions in some types of motor learning and coordination, is generally conserved among vertebrates. However, some cerebellar features are species specific. It is not clear which genes are involved in forming these conserved and species-specific structures and functions. This study uses zebrafish transgenic larvae expressing fluorescent proteins in granule cells, Purkinje cells, or other cerebellar neurons and glial cells to isolate each type of cerebellar cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and to profile their gene expressions by RNA sequencing and in situ hybridization. We identify genes that are upregulated in granule cells or Purkinje cells, including many genes that are also expressed in mammalian cerebella. Comparison of the transcriptomes in granule cells and Purkinje cells in zebrafish larvae reveals that more developmental genes are expressed in granule cells, whereas more neuronal-function genes are expressed in Purkinje cells. We show that some genes that are upregulated in granule cells or Purkinje cells are also expressed in the cerebellum-like structures. Our data provide a platform for understanding the development and function of the cerebellar neural circuits in zebrafish and the evolution of cerebellar circuits in vertebrates. J. Comp. Neurol. 525:1558-1585, 2017. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据