4.5 Article

Incomplete circle of Willis variants and stroke outcome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110383

关键词

Stroke; Circulatory anastomosis; Circle of Willis; Anatomic variants

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS104364, R01HL144541]
  2. NIH [NINDS U01NS095869]
  3. Roche Diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that the variants of the circle of Willis may be associated with a poorer prognosis for stroke patients.
Background: There is considerable variation in circle of Willis morphology among the general population, and these variations have been correlated with risk of aneurysms, cerebral ischemia, and other clinical events. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between circle of Willis variants and stroke outcome. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study involving 297 patients from our institution's acute stroke academic registry. All received MRA examinations of the head upon admission for acute strokes. All imaging was reviewed to assess for circle of Willis variants (particularly A1 and P1 aplasia or hypoplasia) along with vertebral artery aplasia or hypoplasia. Stroke outcome was defined as good (walking independently at the time of discharge) or poor (inability to walk at discharge, assistance needed to walk at discharge, or death). Severity of stroke was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Results: An incomplete circle of Willis was seen in 34% of subjects. There was no significant association between age, gender, hypertension, or presence of arterial stenosis and circle of Willis completeness. Using logistic regression, we found that the presence of an incomplete circle of Willis decreased the odds of a stroke patient having a good outcome by 47% (p = 0.046, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.281-0.988), after adjusting for age and severity of stroke at admission. Conclusion: This study suggests that an incomplete circle of Willis may be associated with a poorer prognosis for stroke patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据