4.5 Article

Palladium-Catalyzed Oxidation of Glucose in Glycopeptides

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2022, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.202200677

关键词

Glucose; Glycopeptides; Oxidation; Oxime ligation; Palladium catalysis

资金

  1. Dutch Organization for Scientific Research [VENI 722.016.006]
  2. European Union through the Rosalind Franklin Fellowship COFUND project [60021]
  3. Fondazione Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (Italy) [2014/0306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective modification of carbohydrate residues in glycopeptides is important in glycobiology. In this study, palladium-catalyzed oxidation was used to achieve the same purpose, and the catalyst proved suitable for the oxidation of glucose residues. Careful optimization of reaction conditions is necessary to achieve desired conversion rates and avoid excessive oxidation of amino acid side-chains. The resulting carbonyl function can be used for oxime-ligation with biotin.
Selective modification of carbohydrate residues in glycopeptides is highly relevant as a tool in glycobiology. In particular, oxidation allows for subsequent ligation with a label or handle and can be effectuated enzymatically or chemically. Chemical oxidation of carbohydrate residues in glycopeptides is nearly invariably done using periodate cleavage, leading to aldehydes. In this work, we applied palladium-catalyzed oxidation for the same purpose. The catalyst, [(neocuproine)PdOAc](2)OTf2, developed for the site-selective oxidation of mono- and oligosaccharides on preparative scale, proved suitable for the oxidation of glucose residues in a series of glucopeptides. Careful optimization of the reaction conditions is necessary to get acceptable conversions without excessive over-oxidation of amino acid side-chains, in particular threonine. The resulting carbonyl function can be used for an oxime-ligation to biotin. A protocol for the analysis of the products using mass spectrometry is also reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据