4.7 Article

Validation of a subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome screening tool for motoric cognitive risk syndrome-A prospective cohort study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 2925-2933

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15476

关键词

classification; cognition; dementia; epidemiology; gait

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG036921-01A1, R01AG044007-01A1, R01AG057548-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the validity of subjective cognitive and motoric complaints for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) and developed a score to define subjective MCR. The results showed that subjective MCR can serve as a remote screening assessment for MCR and help identify individuals at high risk for dementia.
Background and purpose Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a gait-based pre-dementia syndrome associated with risk of dementia. Ascertaining subjective cognitive and motoric complaints may facilitate early and remote identification of individuals with MCR as they are reported to precede and predict objective cognitive and motoric impairments in aging. Methods The validity of five subjective motoric complaint (SMC) questions and 10 subjective cognitive complaint (SCC) questions was examined for discriminating MCR in 538 non-demented community-dwelling adults. Backward logistic regression was used to identify questions to develop a weighted score to define subjective MCR (MCR-S). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the discriminative ability of MCR-S for the objective MCR (MCR-O) definition based on SCCs and objectively measured gait. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to examine the predictive validity of MCR-S for incident dementia. Results Five subjective complaint questions (three SCC and two SMC) were associated with MCR-O. They were combined to define an MCR-S score (range 0-7) which yielded an area under the curve of 0.89 for discriminating MCR-O from receiver operating characteristic analysis. An optimal cut-score of 2 on the MCR-S score was determined to have good sensitivity (84%) and specificity (82%) for MCR-O. Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 29 participants developed dementia. Both MCR-S (adjusted hazard ratio 2.39) and MCR-O at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio 3.16) predicted risk of incident dementia. Conclusions Subjective MCR had high concordance with MCR-O and can provide a remote screening assessment for MCR-O, which can identify those at high risk for dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据