4.5 Article

Metal-Mediated Interactions in Homo- and Heterobimetallic Edifices with Lanthanides: A Study in Solution

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.202200235

关键词

Cooperative effects; Heterobimetallic complexes; Homobimetallic complexes; Lanthanides; Tripodal ligands

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. University of Strasbourg (France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the coordination properties of a series of lanthanide cations with a tripodal homoditopic ligand were investigated. The results showed the significance of balancing the rigidity of the ligand structure and the flexibility of the side arms in accommodating two trivalent cations in a supramolecular ensemble.
We report here on the coordination properties of a series of lanthanide cations (Ln=La, Nd, Eu, Tb, Er) with a tripodal homoditopic ligand L, which is bearing three diamido-dihydroxamate arms anchored on a tertiary amine. The complexes of L with lanthanides were studied in a MeOH/H2O (80/20 by weight) solvent and a marked size-discriminating effect depending on the intramolecular interactions was observed in the tripodal dinuclear lanthanide edifice. Positive cooperative effects favour the formation of the bimetallic LLn(2) complexes compared with the monometallic analogues for the heavier lanthanide cations (Eu, Tb, Er), while the lighter ones (La, Nd) show a decrease of cooperative interactions in the corresponding bimetallic species. Moreover, increased levels of heterobimetallic complexes are detected for Ln(III) pairs containing a lighter Ln(III) ion and a heavier one. In contrast with the adjunctive ligand exchange reported for LFe2 and CDTA, the corresponding substitution reaction for LLn(2) occurs according to a disjunctive mechanism. Our work thus highlights the importance of the balance between the rigidity of a tripodal structure and the flexibility of the side arms to accommodate two trivalent cations in a supramolecular ensemble.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据