4.2 Article

Early- and late-onset posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders among adult kidney and liver transplant recipients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 109, 期 4, 页码 343-350

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13815

关键词

kidney transplantation; liver transplantation; posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder; solid organ transplantation

资金

  1. Danmarks Grundforskningsfond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early and late PTLD show differences in clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and pathology. Recipients with late PTLD have a lower prevalence of detectable EBV DNA in plasma, are diagnosed with more advanced disease, and are more frequently treated with chemotherapy.
Objectives Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in solid organ transplant recipients has a high mortality and may present early (<2 years) or late (>= 2 years) posttransplantation. We investigated the clinical characteristics of early and late PTLD among kidney and liver transplant recipients. Methods Recipients, transplanted at Rigshospitalet, with PTLD development as adults from January 2010 to August 2020, were included. Clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and pathology of early and late PTLD were compared. Results Thirty-one PTLD cases were detected where 10 (32%) were early and 21 (68%) were late PTLD. EBV DNA in plasma was detected in 78% versus 28% in early and late PTLD (p = .037). None of the recipients with early PTLD and nine recipients with late PTLD (47%) had Ann Arbor stage IV at the time of their diagnosis (p = .006). Cyclophosphamid-Hydroxyrubicin-Oncovin-Prednisolon was used for treatment in 10 (48%) recipients with late PTLD (p = 0.032) only. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Conclusions Recipients with late PTLD had a lower prevalence of detectable EBV DNA in plasma, were diagnosed with more advanced disease, and were more frequently treated with chemotherapy compared to recipients with early PTLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据